pages: SpecialPublicSafetyCommittee/2009-04-07.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
SpecialPublicSafetyCommittee | 2009-04-07 | DRAFT *Special Public Safety Committee Meeting Minutes April 7, 2009 4 Subject: OPD- Performance Measures From: Oakland Police Department Recommendation: Receive An Informational Staff Report From The Police Department On The Proposed 2009-2011 Performance Measures 09-0135 Play Video A motion was made by Member Quan, seconded by Member Nadel, that this matter be Continued to the *Public Safety Committee, due back on June 23, 2009. The motion carried by the following vote: Votes: Councilmember Aye: Member Kernighan, Member Nadel, Member Quan and Chair Reid The Committee directed staff to report on: 1) Comments from the NCPC groups; 2) The decrease in DNA crimes; 3) Track the number of investigations and charged cases by the District Attorney's office and how many of the cases completed have gone down; 4) What our average response time to Part 1 crimes; 5) The Top 3 priorities of the NCPC groups and are they being resolved; 6) The decrease in Rape Kits since the additional funding to the crime lab; 7) The decrease in sideshow crimes; 8) The "target" numbers for Fiscal Year 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009. Providing the targets vs. actuals per year helps give a more complete picture of performance; 9) Under the measure "UCR homicide clearance rate" the department noted: "target lowered to be in line with industry standards" provide context for what the "industry standards" are for each performance measure; 10) Clarification for removing measure number 4, "percentage of investigated cases presented to the DA.", 11) Performance measures for the Communications department with the measure of NCPC meeting attendance to provide 911 public education; 12) Why we are lowering our goals moving forward from the previous years for the number of instances targets and/or actuals (i.e. vice related arrests and narcotics related arrests, the proposed target numbers for 2009-2010 and/or 2010-2011 the goals ought to be to increased; 13) Why the targets are not 100% for police training, if the trainings are P.O.S.T mandated; 14) A measure that tells us what percentage of NCPC priorities are resolved; 15) A measure on the Special Operations attendance at NCPC meetings; 16) The number of arrests per year, number of. field contacts, and traffic stops with an increased target each year to be included as a performance measure; and 17) A presentation from the Dispatch department on goals and priorities. The following individual(s) spoke and did not indicate a position on this item: - Sanjiv Handa - Claudia Burgos View Report.pdf View Supplemental Report.pdf City of Oakland Page 4 Printed on 4/20/09 | 4 | SpecialPublicSafetyCommittee/2009-04-07.pdf |