pages: RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2011-02-03.pdf, 12
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
RulesAndLegislationCommittee | 2011-02-03 | *Rules & Legislation Committee Meeting Minutes February 3, 2011 6 Subject: Detailing The Instant Run Off Voting Outreach And Education Campaign From: Councilmember Ignacio De La Fuente Recommendation: Receive An Informational Report From The Office Of The City Administrator, The City Clerk, And The Alameda County Registrar Of Voters Detailing The Instant Run Off Voting Outreach And Education Campaign Conducted By The Four Non-Profit Organizations That Were Funded With The $100,000 From The Election Campaign Fund And The Outreach And Education Conducted By The Alameda County Registrar Of Voters On Behalf Of The City Of Oakland For The November 2010 Municipal Election 10-0283 A motion was made by Member Schaaf, seconded by Member Reid, that this matter be *Received and Forwarded to the Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Agency / City Council. The motion carried by the following vote: Votes: Aye; 4 - Member Schaaf, Vice Mayor Brooks, Member Reid and President Pro Tempore De La Fuente The Committee received and filed the report and directed staff schedule through Rules, a follow up report that responds to the following questions: - To the City Administrator 1. How did you gauge the results of the City's outreach & education campaign - do you have data that shows precincts that received the additional outreach & education made less mistakes than those that didn't receive the additional outreach & education? 2. In two years, voters will go to the polls again, including many new voters - people who have moved to Oakland from communities that use traditional voting methods, young people that will be 18 or first time voters in that election, etc. Should the City's outreach & education effort be expanded, stay the same or reduced? Why? 3. The City's supplemental outreach & education was to be directed specifically to historically disenfranchised and underrepresented populations in a culturally competent manner, have you reviewed or received from the County an analysis of which neighborhoods did well "filling out their ballots properly" vs. neighborhood that didn't (based on percentage of overvotes)? Why did this occur? 4. When will we have the "comprehensive report" as required and described by our City Charter? From Charter section 1105 (3) The "comprehensive report" for a race shall mean a report that breaks the numbers in the summary report down by precinct. The report shall list for each round the number of ballots cast in each precinct (a) that count as votes for each candidate in that round, (b) that have been declared undervotes, (c) that have been declared overvotes up to that point, and (d) that have been declared exhausted up to that point. - To the Alameda County Registrar of Voters City of Oakland Page 12 Printed on 8/1/11 | 12 | RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2011-02-03.pdf |