pages: OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf, 24
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil | 2021-12-21 | * Concurrent Meeting of the Meeting Minutes - FINAL December 21, 2021 Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council S2.29 Subject: County Of Santa Clara, Et Al. V. Atlantic Richfield Co., Et Al. From: Office Of The City Attorney Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney And City Administrator To Enter Into A Partial Settlement And Disposition Of Lead Paint Settlement Funds From The Settlement Of County Of Santa Clara, Et. Al. V. Atlantic Richfield Co, Et. Al., Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 1-00-Cv-788657, City Attorney's File No. X00625, As Follows: (1) 60% Of Settlement Funds, Approximately $14,000,000, To Be Spent In Oakland For Lead Poisoning Prevention Purposes ("City Services Allocation"); (2) 20% Of City Services Allocation, ,797,184.58 To Be Disbursed Upon Execution Of Memorandum Of Understanding To The City Of Oakland To Fund Development Of An Equity Based Lead Program; (3) 40% Of Present And Future Settlement Funds, Approximately 9,600,000, To Be Distributed To The County Of Alameda To Enhance And Expand Existing Services For Lead Poisoning Prevention In Alameda County; (4) The Remaining 40% Of The City Services Allocation To Be Held In Trust By County Treasurer Subject To An Agreement By The City And The County On Disbursement; (5) The City Administrator To Enter Into The Attached Memorandum Of Understanding Setting Out These Preceding Terms (Office Of The City Attorney - Public Nuisance Enforcement Action) 21-0960 Attachments: View Report View Legislation 88978 CMC Council President Fortunato Bas made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Taylor, to move this item to Non Consent. Council President Bas made a motion seconded by Councilmember Gallo to approve the urgency finding on item S2.29 for the following reasons: That there is a need to take immediate action which came to the attention of the local body after the agenda was posted, and that the need to take immediate action (1) is required to avoid a substantial adverse impact that would occur if the action were deferred to a subsequent special or regular meeting; Motion passed by 8 Ayes: Fife, Gallo, Kalb, Kaplan, Reid, Taylor, Thao, and Fortunato Bas The Legislation was amended to include the following, after the 5th Whereas clause to read: City of Oakland Page 24 Printed on 1/19/2022 | 24 | OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf |