pages: OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf, 18
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil | 2021-12-21 | * Concurrent Meeting of the Meeting Minutes - FINAL December 21, 2021 Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council S2.30 Subject: Claudine Jones V. City Of Oakland, Joseph D. Evinger, Sara A. Evinger, From: Office Of The City Attorney Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To Compromise And Settle The Case Of Claudine Jones V. City Of Oakland, Joseph D. Evinger, Sara A. Evinger, And Does One Through Twenty, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG21087883, City Attorney's File No. 33578, In The Amount Of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars And Zero Cents ($300,000.00) (Department Of Transportation - Dangerous Condition) 21-0961 Attachments: View Report View Legislation A motion was made by Nikki Fortunato Bas, seconded by Noel Gallo, that this matter be Withdrawn and Rescheduled to go before the * Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council, to be heard 1/18/2022. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 8 - Fife, Gallo, Kalb, Kaplan, Reid, Taylor, Thao, and Fortunato Bas NO VOTE: 0 S2.32 Subject: Negrete V. City Of Oakland From: Office Of The City Attorney Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To Compromise And Settle The Case Of Francisco Negrete, William Berger, Craig Tanaka, Brandon Hraiz, Josef Phillips, V. City Of Oakland; Police Commission Of The City Of Oakland; Does 1 - 10, Inclusive, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG20062117, City Attorney's File No. X04860-1, In The Amount Of Forty Thousand Dollars And Zero Cent ($40,000.00) (Community Police Review Agency - Administrative Writ Of Mandamus) 21-0963 Attachments: View Report View Legislation A motion was made by Nikki Fortunato Bas, seconded by Noel Gallo, that this matter be Withdrawn and Rescheduled to go before the * Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council, to be heard 1/18/2022. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 8 - Fife, Gallo, Kalb, Kaplan, Reid, Taylor, Thao, and Fortunato Bas NO VOTE: 0 COMMENCING AS SOON AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE, THE NON - CONSENT CALENDAR PORTION OF THE AGENDA: City of Oakland Page 18 Printed on 1/19/2022 | 18 | OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf |