pages: OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf, 7
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil | 2018-06-19 | Recommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To Compromise And Settle The Case Of Elliott Van Fleet V. City Of Oakland, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG17864375, City Attorney's File No. 31295, In The Amount Of Twelve Million Dollars And Zero Cents ($12,000,000.00) (Oakland Police Department - Motor Vehicle Accident) 18-0667 Attachments: View Report 87241 CMS Councilmember Gallo made a motion seconded by Vice Mayor Campbell Washington to approve the urgency finding on item S7.9 for the following reasons: That there is a need to take immediate action which came to the attention of the local body after the agenda was posted, and that the need to take immediate action (1) is required to avoid a substantial adverse impact that would occur if the action were deferred to a subsequent special or regular meeting. The Urgency motion passed by a vote of 6 Ayes 1 Excused Reid 1 No Brooks. This City Resolution was Adopted. 8 ORAL REPORT OF FINAL DECISIONS MADE DURING CLOSED SESSION & DISCLOSURE OF NON-CONFIDENTIAL CLOSED SESSION DISCUSSIONS There were 3 speakers on this item. This be Accepted. Excused: 1 - - Reid Aye: 7 - Brooks, Campbell Washington, Gallo, McElhaney, Guillén, Kalb, and Kaplan NO VOTE: 0 COMMENCING AT 6:30 P.M., OR AS SOON AS REASONABLY PRACTICABLE THEREAFTER, THE NON - CONSENT CALENDAR PORTION OF THE AGENDA: 9 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS WITH STATUTORY PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS: City of Oakland Page 7 Printed on 5/23/2019 | 7 | OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2018-06-19.pdf |