pages: OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2016-05-03.pdf, 17
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil | 2016-05-03 | Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Meeting Minutes May 3, 2016 Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council 4. Add new Section 5.80.050 -DISPENSARY EQUITY PERMIT PROGRAM: i. Section A: CRITERIA. Applicant must have at least one member who meets all of the following criteria: 1. Be an Oakland resident who, 2. Resides for at least two years prior to the date of application in Oakland Police Department Beats 26Y, 30X, 30Y, 31Z, 32Y, and 34X (Oakland Police Department Beat Map is attached and incorporated herein by reference); or those individuals who, within the last ten years, have been previously incarcerated for marijuana-related offense as a result of a conviction arising out of Oakland, California; 3. Maintains not less than a 50% ownership in the Dispensary applicant entity, partnership, limited liability corporation, collective, corporation, worker cooperative or other recognized ownership entity; and 4. Prior marijuana or cannabis conviction shall not be a bar to equity ownership. 5. Add the following: Section 5.80.020(4)(h) - That no cannabis or cannabis odors shall be detectable by sight or smell outside of a permitted facility. 6. Renumber the balance of the sections accordingly. The Council directed the City Administrator to include the following in the implementation regulations: 1. Strengthened Enforcement of Local Hiring Provisions. Strengthen enforcement of local hiring provisions by creating statutory fines for shortfalls and permit revocation for repeated noncompliance. Additionally, onsite consumption permits should be denied to dispensaries that do not meet the local hiring requirements at the time of their application. 5. Advocate for and Assist Formerly Incarcerated Permit Holders with State Suitability Process. Earmark resources for Oakland to proactively lobby on behalf of licensed local businesses during the state licensing process so that business owners with prior criminal offenses will not be frozen out of the state system. A motion was made by Brooks, seconded by Reid, that this matter be Approved As Amended On Introduction and Scheduled for Final Passage to the Meeting of the Oakland City Council. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 8 - Brooks, Campbell Washington, Gallo, Guillén, Kalb, Kaplan, Reid, and Gibson McElhaney City of Oakland Page 17 Printed on 5/18/2016 | 17 | OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2016-05-03.pdf |