pages: OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2012-10-02.pdf, 22
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil | 2012-10-02 | * Concurrent Meeting of the Meeting Minutes October 2, 2012 Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council 1. To revise Article III: Scope and Exclusions to read as follows: Section 8.58.210 - Exclusions The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to Properties: E. Where the Owner has applied for a City building permit in order to rehabilitate the property within ninety (90) days from the date of acquisition of the property. Should the property be occupied by tenants and access to the property delayed due to issues with the tenants, the Owner can seek additional time through a request to the Building Official. If the permits expire without the permitted work being completed, this exclusion no longer applies and the Owner must register the property with thirty (30) days following the expiration of the permits. 2. To revise Article III: Registration, Inspection and Abatement: Section 8.58.300(C) to read as follows: "Initial registration shall include providing information attesting to the conditions of the property, including readily apparent violations of the Oakland Building Construction Code, Building Maintenance Code, Property Maintenance Code, Fire Code, and Planning Code, as listed in Attachment A and subject to change from time to time as state and local building codes standards change. For the annual registration, the Owner need only report any new substandard conditions and an inspection by the City is not required unless there are reported or otherwise discovered substandard conditions." Staff was also directed to return to Council in one year with an evaluation on the program including a review of its efficacy and an analysis of owners with 6 or fewer properties and whether they are less likely to have blighted properties. And further require this ordinance to include short sales preceded by a notice of default and to remove the exclusion for those owning fewer than 6 units. and upon call of the roll, the motion tied by Ayes: Agency/Councilmember: Kaplan, Kernighan, Nadel, Schaaf - 4 Noes. Brooks, Brunner, De La Fuente, Reid 4 Pursuant to Rule 29 of Council's Rules of Procedures this matter is held over to allow the Mayor to cast the tie-breaking vote. If the Mayor votes in favor of the SUBSTITUTE motion, the Ordinance will be introduced as amended and final passage will be scheduled for the next City Council meeting. If the Mayor votes in oppostion of the SUBSTITUTE motion, Council will return to the consideration of the motion made by Councilmember Brooks and City of Oakland Page 22 Printed on 8/15/14 | 22 | OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyandtheCityCouncil/2012-10-02.pdf |