pages: OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyAndCityCouncil/2015-12-08.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyAndCityCouncil | 2015-12-08 | Special Concurrent Meeting of the Meeting Minutes December 8, 2015 Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency/City Council 9.1 Subject: 6846 Saroni Drive Utility Pole Telecommunications Project Appeal From: Planning & Building Department Recommendation: Conduct A Public Hearing And Upon Conclusion Adopt A Resolution Denying Appeal #PLN15149-A01 And Upholding The Decision Of The City Planning Commission To Approve Regular Design Review To Install A Telecommunications Facility Onto A Replacement Utility Pole Located In The Public Right-Of-Way Fronting The Lot Line At 6846 Saroni Drive 15-0363 Attachments: View Report 85927 CMS Upon the reading of Item 9.1 by the City Clerk, the Public Hearing was opened at 7:59 p.m. Two individuals spoke on this item. Councilmember Campbell Washington made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Gallo, to close the Public Hearing, and hearing no objections, the motion passed by 8 Ayes: Brooks, Campbell Washington, Gallo, Guillén, Kalb, Kaplan, Reid and Council President Gibson McElhaney. Council adopted the resolution as amended with the following addition: Tree Trimming Conditional Approval: Existing vegetation within the right-of-way immediately surrounding the existing utility pole shall be preserved and only minimal pruning (if any) shall be allowed if absolutely necessary to facilitate the actual installation of the pole extension, antennas and/or equipment. Furthermore, any vegetation proposed for trimming and/or removal shall be first marked with colored tape or ribbon (visible from ground level) at least 14 calendar days in advance of proposed removal, with review and approval to trim and/or remove vegetation granted by the Zoning Division Manager, and if applicable, by the Department of Public works Tree Services Division. The only exception to this protocol would be trimming necessary for immediate life safety considerations for public safety. A motion was made by Campbell Washington, seconded by Gallo, that this matter be Adopted as Amended. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 8 - - Brooks, Campbell Washington, Gallo, Guillén, Kalb, Kaplan, Reid, and Gibson McElhaney City of Oakland Page 15 Printed on 1/6/2016 | 15 | OaklandRedevelopmentSuccessorAgencyAndCityCouncil/2015-12-08.pdf |