pages: FinanceAndManagementCommittee/2004-01-13.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | text | page | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
FinanceAndManagementCommittee | 2004-01-13 | 78316 C.M.S..pdf, Attachments: Item 12 12-9-03.pdf, Item 5 -01.13.04.pdf S-19.pdf The Committee directed staff to amend all the Resolutions to add a Resolve stating: . The City will stop payment at the 5th month of contract, if interface module fails." and the Committee also directed staff to provide a supplemental report with an analysis of where the collected 5% Technology Fees will go. A motion was made by Member Brunner, seconded by Chair Wan, that this matter be *Approve as Amended the Recommendation of Staff, and Forward to the Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Agency / City Council, due back on January 20, 2004. As a Non Consent item The motion carried by the following vote: Member De La Fuente Councilmember Excused: Member Brunner, Chair Wan and Member Nadel Councilmember Aye: Enactment No: 78316 6 Subject: Permit, Enforcement, and Records Tracking System Impartial Financial Analysis From: Office of the City Auditor Attachments: Item 12.1 12-9-03.pdf, Item 6 - 01.13.04.pdt The following individual spoke on the following item and did not indicate a position: - Jack McGinity A motion was made by Member Brunner, seconded by Chair Wan, that this matter be *Received and Filed. The motion carried by the following vote: Member De La Fuente Councilmember Excused: Member Brunner, Chair Wan and Member Nadel Councilmember Aye: Subject: Salary Plan Recommendations From: Office of the City Manager Recommendation: A continued discussion of a report and recommendations regarding the preliminary salary plan recommendations for executive, management and unrepresented classifications Item 4 12-9-03.pdf, Item 5 10-14-03.pdf Attachments: Item 5 SUP 10-14-03.pdf Item 7 -01.13.04.pdf, Item 8 10-28-03.pdf, S- 20.pdf, S-24 Supplemental.pdf, S-24.pdf The following individuals spoke and did not indicate a position on this item: - Sanjiv Handa The Committee approved 1) the expansion of salary range to 50%, but City Manager must bring forward for approval at Closed Session reasons for raises and new hire with salaries 20% over subordinate staff; 2) 1 increase per year from 0 to 3 or 4% above the CPI with provisions that a) If no merit increase is possible in that year the City Manager will have the flexibility to give bonuses; and b) If CPI is above 5% council will review the merit increase range at mid budget cycle; 3) retroactive merit increases for staff with completed performance evaluations and directed staff return with the numbers of completed performance evaluations and approximate dollar amount. | 5 | FinanceAndManagementCommittee/2004-01-13.pdf |