{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "City of Oakland\nOffice of the City Clerk\nOakland City Hall\n1 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza\nOakland, California 94612\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nLaTonda Simmons, City\nClerk\nCITY OF OAKLAND\n*Rules & Legislation Committee\nOakland City Hall, 1 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza,\nOakland, California, 94612\nCity of Oakland Website: http://www.oaklandnet.com\nThursday, October 20, 2016\n10:45 AM\nCity Council Chamber, 3rd Floor\nThe Oakland City Council Rules and Legislation Committee convened at 10:53\na.m. with Council President Gibson McElhaney presiding as Chairperson.\nRoll Call / Call To Order\nCouncilmember Kalb arrived at the meeting at 10:55 a.m.\nPresent 4 - Abel J. Guill\u00e9n, Dan Kalb, Laurence E. Reid, and Lynette Gibson McElhaney\n1\nDetermination Of Closed Session\n16-0266\nAttachments: View Report\nSpecial Closed Session has been scheduled for November 1, 2016 at 3:00 p.m.\nA motion was made by Abel J. Guill\u00e9n, seconded by Larry Reid, that this matter\nbe Accepted. The motion carried by the following vote:\nAye: 4 - Guill\u00e9n, Kalb, Reid, and Gibson McElhaney\n2\nApproval Of The Draft Minutes From The Committee Meeting Of September 22, 2016\nAnd September 29, 2016\n16-0267\nAttachments:\n9/22 View Report\n9/29 View Report\nA motion was made by Larry Reid, seconded by Abel J. Guill\u00e9n, that this matter\nbe Accepted. The motion carried by the following vote:\nAye: 4 - Guill\u00e9n, Kalb, Reid, and Gibson McElhaney\n3\nDetermination Of Schedule Of Outstanding Committee Items\n16-0268\nAttachments: View Report\nA motion was made by Larry Reid, seconded by Abel J. Guill\u00e9n, that this matter\nbe Accepted. The motion carried by the following vote:\nCity of Oakland\nPage 1\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 1, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\nAye: 4- - Guill\u00e9n, Kalb, Reid, and Gibson McElhaney\n4\nScheduling Of Agenda Items And Revisions To Previously Distributed 10-Day\nAgendas (SUPPLEMENTAL)\n16-0269\nAttachments: View Report\nCouncil President Gibson McElhaney was noted absent at 10:58 a.m. and\nPresident Pro Tempore Reid chaired the meeting.\nA motion was made by Abel J. Guill\u00e9n, seconded by Dan Kalb, that this matter be\nAccepted as Amended. The motion carried by the following vote:\nAye: 4 Guill\u00e9n, Kalb, Reid, and Gibson McElhaney\n4.1\nSubject:\nCensure of President of the Council Lynette Gibson-McElhaney.\nFrom:\nCouncilmember Desley Brooks On Behalf Of Members Of The Public\nRecommendation: Schedule The Following:\nA) A Censure Hearing, And Possible Referral To The Alameda County District\nAttorney's Office, Of Councilmember Lynnette Gibson-McElhaney For Violation Of\nThe City And State Laws, Council Rules Of Procedure, Ethics Rules And Oakland City\nCharter Investigated And Established By The Alameda County Grand Jury. Charges:\n1. Councilmember Gibson-McElhaney Had A Conflict Of Interest That Prohibited Her\nFrom Using Her Elected Position To Influence An Administrative Decision On The\nTownhouse Project. 2. Councilmember Gibson-McElhaney Violated Ethics Rules By\nPrivately Contacting A Department Head And City Staff To Argue Personal\nObjections, Resulting In The Department Head Re-Evaluating The Project. This Gave\nThe Appearance That The Department Head Was An Advocate For The\nCouncilmember. 3. Councilmember Gibson-McElhaney Improperly Used City\nResources By Having Her Chief Of Staff Draft A Letter For Her In Opposition To The\nProject For The Councilmember. The Grand Jury Believes That Was A Misuse Of City\nResources Solely Intended To Benefit The Councilmember Personally. 4.\nCouncilmember Gibson-McElhaney Violated Of City And State Rules, During A\nPlanning Commission Hearing, Where She Inappropriately Used Her Position To\nQuestion City Policy, To Challenge Staff, And To Interrupt Proceedings. 5.\nCouncilmember Gibson-McElhaney Violated Section 218 Of The City Charter. And,\n16-0284\nSponsors: Ms. Brooks and Member(s) of the Public\nAttachments: View Report\nCouncilmember Kalb made a motion to move to (1) refer the matter to the City\nAdministrator for further investigation by an independent investigator, (2)\nprovide that the independent investigation may be done by the Public Ethic\nCommission, and (3) provide that the City Administrator/PEC bring the matter\nback to the Rules Committee immediately after completion of the investigation.\nThis City Resolution be Continued.to go before the *Rules & Legislation\nCommittee\nCity of Oakland\nPage 2\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 2, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\nB) And An Informational Report From The City Council And Public Ethics Commission\nExplaining Why No Action Has Been Taken. The Grand Jury Concluded That The\nFailure Of The Oakland City Council And The Oakland Public Ethics Commission To\nRecognize And Address These Breaches Of Ethical Standards Is Unacceptable.; As\nSoon As Possible On The November 1, 2016 City Council Agenda And The As A\nPublic Hearing November 1, 2016\n16-0285\nSponsors: Ms. Brooks and Member(s) of the Public\nThis Informational Report be Continued.to go before the *Rules & Legislation\nCommittee\n4.2\nSubject:\nMeasure Z Evaluation Services Contract Award\nFrom:\nOffice Of The City Administrator\nRecommendation: Adopt A 1) Resolution Authorizing The City Administrator To Enter\nInto A Contract With Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. To: A) Evaluate Select\nOakland Unite Strategies For One Year From October 2016 Through December 2017\nFor Up To $175,000, With The Option To Extend The Contract For Three Additional\nYears For A Total Amount Of Seven Hundred Twelve Thousand Dollars ($712,000);\nAnd, B) Evaluate, Annually, All Oakland Unite Programs For One Year From October\n2016 Through December 2017 For Up To $170,000, With The Option To Extend The\nContract For Three Additional Years For A Total Amount Of Seven Hundred\nTwenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($725,000). 2) Enter Into A Contract With Resource\nDevelopment Associates To Evaluate, Annually, The Police Department's Geographic\nAnd Community Policing Programs For One Year From October 2016 Through\nDecember 2017 For Up To $102,000, With The Option To Extend The Contract For\nThree Additional Years, For A Total Amount Of Four Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand\nDollars ($498,000)\n16-0282\nSponsors: Office Of The City Administrator\nAttachments: View Report\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the *Public Safety Committee to\nbe heard 11/15/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 3\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 3, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\n4.3\nSubject:\nWaterways Enforcement Equipment Grant\nFrom:\nOakland Police Department\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing The City Administrator Or\nDesignee To Accept And Appropriate Grant Funds From The State Of California\nDepartment Of Parks And Recreation, Division Of Boating And Waterways, In An\nAmount Not To Exceed Forty-Four Thousand Three Hundred And Eighty-Two Dollars\n($44,382) By September 30, 2017, To Purchase Equipment For The Marine\nEnforcement Unit (MEU) Of The Oakland Police Department (OPD)\n16-0279\nSponsors: Oakland Police Department\nAttachments: View Report\nDue to specific grant deadlines, staff requested placing this item directly to the\nCity Council agenda on 11/1/2016 bypassing the Public Safety Committee.\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\n4.4\nSubject:\nAffordable Housing On The Oak To Ninth Project\nFrom:\nGene Hazzard / Member Of The Public\nRecommendation: An Informational Report Related To The April 4, 2016 And The\nMay 16, 2016 Letters From The State Department Of Finance Denying The City's\nRequest For The Enforceable Obligation Of The Use Of $4,000,000.00 For The\nConstruction Of Affordable Housing On The Oak To Ninth Project Also Provide The\nPercentage Of Ownership In The Project Of Oakland Harbor Partners (AKA Signature\nProperties) And Zarison. Include The Current Status Of The Funds On Hand For The\nConstruction Of Affordable Housing On The Oak To 9th Project\n16-0273\nSponsors: Member(s) of the Public\nAttachments: View Report\nThis Informational Report be Scheduled.1 to go before the *Community &\nEconomic Development Committee to be heard 12/6/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 4\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 4, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\n4.5\nSubject:\nAbatement And Abandoned Vehicles\nFrom:\nMary Maultsby-Jeffrey / Member Of The Public\nRecommendation: Request Full Report On Abatement And Abandonment Of Vehicles\nLeft On The Streets Of Oakland For More Than 72 Hours And Cars Being Parked On\nThe Streets Of Oakland By Unlicensed Or Licensed Auto Dealers Who Are Using The\nStreets Of Oakland To Sell Mass Numbers Of Vehicles (Many Of Them Unoperable).\nRequest Information Regarding Ticketing Of These Vehicles Who Have No License\nPlates, Are Not Moved On Street Sweeping Day And Are Not Being Ticketed By Any\nAgency\n16-0272\nSponsors: Member(s) of the Public\nAttachments: View Report\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the *Public Safety Committee to\nbe heard 12/6/2016\n4.6\nSubject:\nOPD Crime Lab Supplies Procurement\nFrom:\nOakland Police Department\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Waiving The City's Competitive Advertising\nAnd Bidding, And The Request For Proposals/Qualifications Requirements For The\nPurchase Of Certified And Accredited Forensic Laboratory Analytical Supplies,\nEquipment, Instrumentation, Software, And Related Services On An As-Needed Basis\nWhen Crime Laboratory Subject Matter Experts Determine Such Supplies And / Or\nServices Are Required By Forensic Casework Conditions, The Laboratory's Validated\nMethods, Or Its Quality Assurance Program, Or Needed For The Timely Analysis Of\nEvidence, Or When The Materials Or Services Are Available From Only One Source\nIn The Amount Of Up To Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350,000) Per Fiscal\nYear Through June 30, 2020 For A Total Cost Not To Exceed One Million Four\nHundred Thousand Dollars ($1,400,000)\n16-0281\nSponsors: Oakland Police Department\nAttachments: View Report\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the *Public Safety Committee to\nbe heard 12/6/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 5\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 5, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\n4.7\nSubject:\nFY 2016-17 Justice Local Assistance Grant (JAG) Funds\nFrom:\nOakland Police Department\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing The City Administrator Or\nDesignee To Accept And Appropriate The Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 U.S. Department Of\nJustice (DOJ) Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Funds In An\nAmount Not To Exceed Six Hundred And Nine Thousand, Seven Hundred Eighty\nDollars ($609,780) For October 1, 2015 Through September 30, 2019\n16-0280\nSponsors: Oakland Police Department\nAttachments: View Report\nDue to specific grant deadlines, staff requested placing this item directly to the\nCity Council agenda on 11/1/2016 bypassing the Public Safety Committee.\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\n4.8\nSubject:\nReport On Residential Parking Permit Program\nFrom:\nCouncilmember Dan Kalb\nRecommendation: Receive Informational Report On Residential Parking Permit (RPP)\nProgram Implementation And Administration, Including But Not Limited To (1) Status\nOf Pending RPP Zone Applications And (2) Evaluation Of Parking Enforcement\nResources For Existing RPP Zones And Anticipated Increase In The Number Of\nZones.; On The First Public Works Committee Meeting In 2017\n16-0333\nSponsors: Dan Kalb\nThis Informational Report be Scheduled.to go before the *Public Works\nCommittee to be heard 1/10/2017\n4.9\nSubject:\nSettlement Of Anita Aaron V. City Of Oakland, Case No. RG1471738\nFrom:\nOffice Of The City Attorney\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To\nCompromise And Settle The Case Of Anita Aaron V. City Of Oakland, Alameda\nCounty Superior Court Case No. RG14717380, City Attorney's File No. 29982, In The\nAmount Of One Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars And Zero Cents ($110,000.00)\n(Public Works - Dangerous Condition)\n16-0334\nSponsors: Office Of The City Administrator\nAttachments:\nView Report\n86453 CMS\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 6\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 6, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\n4.10\nSubject:\nSettlement Agreement Of Tracy Hobbs V. City Of Oakland, Et Al.\nFrom:\nOffice Of The City Attorney\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To\nCompromise And Settle The Case Of Tracy Hobbs V. City Of Oakland, Alameda\nCounty Superior Court Case No. RG14753212, City Attorney's File No. 30121, In The\nAmount Of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars And Zero Cents ($75,000.00) (Public\nWorks - Dangerous Condition)\n16-0335\nSponsors: Office Of The City Attorney\nAttachments: View Report\n86454 CMS\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\n4.11\nSubject:\nSettlement Agreement Of Michael Smith, ET Al., V. City Of Oakland\nFrom:\nOffice Of The City Attorney\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To\nCompromise And Settle The Case Of Michael Smith, A Minor By And Through His\nGuardian Ad Litem Danelle Cyrus V. City Of Oakland, Alameda County Superior Court\nCase No. RG15778881, City Attorney's File No. 30524, In The Amount Of Sixty\nThousand Dollars And Zero Cents ($60,000.00) (Oakland Parks And Recreation -\nDangerous Condition)\n16-0337\nSponsors: Office Of The City Attorney\nAttachments: View Report\n86455 CMS\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 7\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 7, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\n4.12\nSubject:\nSettle The Claim Of CSAA Insurance\nFrom:\nThe Office The City Attorney\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Authorizing And Directing The City Attorney To\nCompromise And Settle The Claim Of CSAA Insurance Exchange As Subrogee Of\n(A/S/O) Jeanne Foss-Swaine, In The Amount Of Seven Thousand Four Hundred\nTwenty Dollars And 43/100 Cents ($7,420.43) As The Result Of Damages Sustained\nFrom An Automobile Collision On January 17, 2015 (Oakland Police Department -\nAutomobile Collision)\n16-0338\nSponsors: Office Of The City Attorney\nAttachments: View Report\n86456 CMS\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.tc go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\n4.13\nSubject:\nClassic Safety Police Employee Pension Cost Sharing\nFrom:\nTreasury Bureau\nRecommendation: Conduct A Public Hearing And Upon Conclusion Adopt The\nFollowing Pieces Of Legislation\n1) A Resolution Of Intention To Approve An Amendment To Contract Between The\nBoard Of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System And The\nCity Council City Of Oakland, And\n16-0318\nSponsors: Office Of The City Administrator\nAttachments:\nView Report\n86465 CMS\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 8\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 8, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\nSubject:\nClassic Safety Police Employee Pension Cost Sharing\nFrom:\nOffice Of The City Administrator\nRecommendation: Adopt An Ordinance Of The City Of Oakland To Approve An\nAmendment To The Contract Between The City Of Oakland And The Board Of\nAdministration Of The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CALPERS);\nTo Include A One Percent (1%) Employees Cost Sharing Of Additional Benefits For\nTier I And Tier Il Classic Police Members (California Government Code Section\n20516)\n16-0336\nSponsors: Office Of The City Administrator\nAttachments:\nView Report\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.tc go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\n4.14\nSubject:\nPublic Bank Feasibility Study\nFrom:\nCouncilmember Kaplan, Councilmember Kalb and Councilmember Guillen\nRecommendation: Adopt A Resolution Directing The City Administrator To Prepare An\nInformational Report With The Cost Estimates Of Commissioning A Study Analyzing\nThe Feasibility And Economic Impact Of Establishing A Public Bank For Or Including\nThe City Of Oakland, And Providing Funding Options For The Feasibility Study,\nIncluding The Option Of Allocating To The Study Any Remainder Of The Money That\nWas Budgeted For The Goldman Sachs Debarment Proceedings\n16-0339\nSponsors: Kaplan and Kalb\nAttachments: Supplemental Report\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the *Finance & Management\nCommittee to be heard 11/15/2016\nStaff requested to move items 5 and 6 from the October 25, 2016 Community and\nEconomic Development Committee meeting to November 15, 2016 committee\nmeeting. In addition to move item 6, which was scheduled for a Public Hearing\nfor November 1, 2016 City Council meeting, to be moved to November 29, 2016.\nCity of Oakland\nPage 9\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 9, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\nSubject:\nMacArthur Station - Consent To Property Conveyance\nFrom:\nEconomic And Workforce Development\nRecommendation: Adopt The Following Pieces Of Legislation:\n1) An ORSA Resolution Authorizing The Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency\nAdministrator Or Designee To (A) Execute A Consent To The Conveyance Of Parcels\nA And C-1 Of MacArthur Station By MacArthur Transit Community Partners, LLC\n(\"MTCP\") To Hines, Or One Of Its Affiliates, For Development Of Two Rental\nResidential/Retail Buildings, Pursuant To The Terms Of An Owner Participation\nAgreement (\"OPA\") Between The Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency And\nMTCP; And (B) Amend The OPA To (1) Reduce The Size Of The Retail Component,\nChange The Size Of The Retail Component For Each Parcel And Establish Retail\nLeasing Requirements For Parcel A, And (2) Extend Certain Development Deadlines;\nRelying On The Previously Certified 2008 Environmental Impact Report And 2015\nCEQA Addendum Per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162-15164, 15183, 15183.3,\n15168 And 15180, And Separately And Independently Finding Certain Of The Above\nActions Are Not A \"Project\" Under CEQA; And\n16-0275\nSponsors: Economic & Workforce Development Department\nAttachments: View Report\nView Supplemental Report\nThis be Rescheduled. to go before the *Community & Economic Development\nCommittee to be heard 11/15/2016\n2) A Resolution Authorizing The City Administrator Or Designee To Execute A\nConsent To The Conveyance By Macarthur Transit Community Partners, LLC\n(\"MTCP\") To Hines, Or One Of Its Affiliates, Of Parcels A And C-1 Of Macarthur\nStation For Development Of Two Rental Residential/Retail Buildings, Pursuant To The\nTerms Of A Development Agreement Between The City Of Oakland And MTCP And\nRelying On The Previously Certified 2008 Environmental Impact Report And 2015\nCEQA Addendum Per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162-15164, 15183, 15183.3,\n15168 And 15180, And Separately And Independently Finding The Conveyance Is Not\nA \"Project\" Under CEQA\n16-0276\nSponsors: Economic & Workforce Development Department\nThis City Resolution be Rescheduled.to go before the *Community & Economic\nDevelopment Committee to be heard 11/15/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 10\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 10, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\nSubject:\nMacArthur BART Parcels A And C1 Revision To FDP\nFrom:\nPlanning And Building Department\nRecommendation: Conduct A Public Hearing And Upon Conclusion Adopt A\nResolution, As Recommended By The Planning Commission, Revising The MacArthur\nBART Parcels A And C1 Final Development Permit (Case File PUDF08/ER01),\nRelying On The 2008 MacArthur Station Project Environmental Impact Report And\nAddenda, Finding That No Additional Environmental Review Is Needed Pursuant To\nCEQA Guidelines Sections 15162-15164 And Adopting Related CEQA Findings\n16-0274\nSponsors: Planning & Building Department\nAttachments: View Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nThis City Resolution be Rescheduled.to go before the *Community & Economic\nDevelopment Committee to be heard 11/15/2016\nStaff requested to place an item presented at the dais regarding \"Uptown Art\nDistrict\" as no date pending to perform more community outreach.\nAdditional Request at the dais made by President Pro Tempore Reid to present\nan oral report regarding Workforce System Rapid Response and Layoff Aversion\nServices.\nSubject:\nWorkforce System Rapid Response and Layoff Aversion Services\nFrom:\nThe Office Of The City Administrator\nRecommendation: Recieve An Oral Informational Report On Workforce System Rapid\nResponse and Layoff Aversion Services\n16-0341\nThis Informational Report be Scheduled.to go before the *Community &\nEconomic Development Committee to be heard 10/25/2016\nMember of the Public requested to place an item for scheduling for Examining\nAlameda County Probate Process and the Grand Jury Investigation.\nCity of Oakland\nPage 11\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 11, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\n5\nA Review Of The Draft Agendas For The City Council Meeting Of November 1, 2016\nAnd Rules And Legislation Committee Of November 3, 2016\n16-0270\nAttachments: View Report\nCity Clerk noted several adjustments to the November 1, 2016 agenda including\nremoval of Public Hearing as requested previously by Councilmember Guillen,\nadding the Infrastructure Bond Ordinance, deferring MacArthur Station Public\nHearing to future City Council meeting and addition of Public Hearing regarding\nupdating of fire code onto November 1, 2016 City Council Agenda that were\nforwarded through the Public Safety and Community and Economic Development\nCommittees.\nStaff also requested removal of item 7.5 on the November 1, 2016 City Council\nAgenda because a resolution was adopted by the City Council and not an\nordinance.\nThere were 2 speakers on this item.\nA motion was made by Abel J. Guill\u00e9n, seconded by Dan Kalb, that this matter be\nAccepted. The motion carried by the following vote:\nAye: 3 - Guill\u00e9n, Kalb, and Reid\nAbsent: 1 - Gibson McElhaney\nSubject:\nInfrastructure Bond Affordable Housing Enabling Ordinance\nFrom:\nOffice Of The City Administrator\nRecommendation: Adopt An Ordinance Amending The Oakland Municipal Code To\nEnact The City Of Oakland Affordable Housing And Infrastructure Bond Law, Which\nProvides For Issuance Of General Obligation Bonds To Fund The Affordable Housing\nProgram And Other Purposes Described Herein\n16-0340\nAttachments: View Report\nView Report\nSupplemental Report\nSupplemental Report\nThis City Resolution be Scheduled.to go before the Concurrent Meeting of the\nOakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council to be heard\n11/1/2016\nCity of Oakland\nPage 12\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 12, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\n6\nSubject:\nCampaign Reform Act Amendment\nFrom:\nCouncilmembers Kalb, Gallo, Guillen, Vice Mayor Campbell-Washington\nand City Attorney Parker\nRecommendation: Adopt An Ordinance Amending The \"Oakland Campaign Reform\nAct\" (OCRA) Ordinance (A) Aligning OCRA With The 2014 Amendment To The\nOakland City Charter Section 603, (B) Strengthening The Commission's Enforcement\nAuthority To Match The Government Ethics Act And The California Political Reform\nAct, And (C) Clarifying And Expanding Definitions And Substantive Provisions To\nEnsure The Act Uses Clear And Enforceable Language And (D) Enhance\nIndependent Expenditure Disclosure Requirements\n16-0255\nSponsors: Kalb\nAttachments: View Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nView Supplemental Report\nStaff noted that the submitted ordinance included addition of new sponsors:\nCouncilmember Noel Gallo, Guillen, Campbell Washington, and City Attorney\nBarbara Parker.\nA motion was made by Abel J. Guill\u00e9n, seconded by Dan Kalb, that this matter be\nApprove as Amended the Recommendation of Staff, and Forward to go before\nthe Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and\nthe City Council, to be heard 11/1/2016. The motion carried by the following vote:\nAye: 3- - Guill\u00e9n, Kalb, and Reid\nAbsent: 1 - - Gibson McElhaney\nOpen Forum (Total Time Available: 15 Minutes)\nThere were 4 speakers on Open Forum.\nAdjournment\nThere being no further business, and upon the motion duly made, the Oakland\nCity Council Rules and Legislation Committee adjourned the meeting at 1:11 p.m.\nCity of Oakland\nPage 13\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 13, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}
{"body": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee", "date": "2016-10-20", "text": "*Rules & Legislation Committee\nMeeting Minutes - FINAL\nOctober 20, 2016\nAmericans With Disabilities Act\nIf you need special assistance to participate in Oakland City Council and\nCommittee meetings please contact the Office of the City Clerk. When possible,\nplease notify the City Clerk 5 days prior to the meeting so we can make\nreasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Also, in compliance with\nOakland's policy for people with environmental illness or multiple chemical\nsensitivities, please refrain from wearing strongly scented products to meetings.\nOffice of the City Clerk - Agenda Management Unit\nPhone: (510)238-6406\nFax: (510)238-6699\nRecorded Agenda: (510)238-2386\nTelecommunications Display Device: (510)238-3254\nMATERIALS RELATED TO ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL\nAFTER DISTRIBUTION OF THE AGENDA PACKETS MAY BE VIEWED IN THE OFFICE OF THE\nCITY CLERK, 1 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA, 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR, OAKLAND, CA 94612 FROM\n8:30AM TO 5:00PM\n* In the event a quorum of the City Council participates on this Committee, the meeting is\nnoticed as a Special Meeting of the City Council; however, no final City Council action can be\ntaken.\nCity of Oakland\nPage 14\nPrinted on 11/29/2016", "page": 14, "path": "RulesAndLegislationCommittee/2016-10-20.pdf"}